AN EMPIRE THAT KEEPS ITS RECEIPTS CAN READ THEM ALOUD.

JUSTICE · RACIAL JUSTICE

Published by Langhorne P. Breedlove

MONDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 2026 · 12:59 AM ET

Tags: Racial Justice · U.S. Foreign Policy · Declassification · Historical Accountability · International Repair

Dear fellow American proletariat: The United States has always been quite enthusiastic about telling other countries to confront their past. We recommend a modest administrative innovation: open our own filing cabinets.

A serious republic should be able to say what it did abroad, who authorized it, who suffered, what the evidence actually establishes, and whether a lawful remedy is owed. Instead, public arguments too often oscillate between two remarkable propositions: that America has never made a mistake, and that America must somehow be responsible for everything that has ever gone wrong anywhere. Neither is history. Both are shortcuts around it.

THE MANDATE

American Proletariat proposes a standing, independently reviewed Truth & Repair for U.S. Intervention process: identify historically significant American interventions and covert operations; declassify appropriate records; commission country-specific investigations; invite testimony from affected communities and governments; identify documented harms and relevant legal responsibilities; and evaluate apologies, restitution, rehabilitation, institutional safeguards, or negotiated remedies where the record warrants them.

Each case must distinguish American actions from the independent choices of local governments, armed groups, private companies and other foreign powers. An investigation is not a verdict. An apology is not automatically a legal admission of unlimited liability. A repair program must be designed with the people affected, not announced over their heads by someone who has recently discovered an atlas.

ROOTS · GUATEMALA, 1954

The State Department's official Foreign Relations of the United States retrospective volume documents the CIA's covert operation in Guatemala leading to the 1954 removal of elected president Jacobo Árbenz Guzmán. Its historians acknowledged that an earlier documentary volume had omitted the CIA role, partly because relevant material was denied release during declassification review (Source 01).

The later retrospective drew on CIA operational records, including the programs known as PBFORTUNE, PBSUCCESS and PBHISTORY. Those are not inventions from an internet conspiracy forum; they are names in the U.S. government's own published archival record (Source 02). The documentation establishes important U.S. actions. It does not establish that every subsequent injustice in Guatemala had one actor or one cause.

That is the first test of an honest inquiry: name the specific intervention, the dates, the institutions, the people and the evidence. Explain what follows from the documents and what does not. If the government's own historical edition was incomplete, the correction belongs in the public record too.

CHILE · DOCUMENTS DON’T ERASE THE PEOPLE

On June 30, 1999, the National Archives announced an interagency release of U.S. files relating to human-rights abuses, terrorism and political violence in Chile from 1973 through 1978. The release involved the State Department, CIA, Defense Department, Justice Department, FBI and National Archives. The archive explained the review would continue into earlier periods (Source 03).

On August 25, 2023, the State Department announced the declassification of portions of two Presidential Daily Briefs concerning Chile dated September 8 and September 11, 1973, at the request of Chile's government. The Department expressly acknowledged the competing obligations of historical transparency and protecting intelligence sources and methods (Source 04).

Neither publication permits a writer to infer that every claim about Chile has now been proved, that every file has been released, or that one country's political violence can be reduced to a single foreign decision. A responsible commission should make the underlying records accessible, identify unresolved gaps, hear Chilean perspectives, and distinguish contemporaneous intelligence from decisions actually taken.

THE RIGHT TO KNOW IS NOT A PUBLIC-RELATIONS CAMPAIGN

The State Department's Foreign Relations of the United States series is the official documentary history of major U.S. foreign-policy decisions and significant diplomatic activity. Federal law directs the series to be thorough, accurate and reliable, and mandates publication of volumes thirty years after the events they document, with access to relevant records under statutory procedures (Source 05).

That framework gives us an institution to strengthen. We propose clear declassification review timetables, documented reasons for withholding, independent appeals, digital access to released records, searchable country-specific inventories, translation where appropriate, and protections for legitimately sensitive sources. Researchers must be able to reconstruct what decision-makers knew at the time, not merely read an official explanation written decades later.

The point is not reckless disclosure of names that would endanger people or compromise lawful intelligence operations. The point is that national security cannot become a permanent synonym for 'Please stop asking.'

HOW REPAIR WOULD WORK

In December 2005, the United Nations General Assembly adopted Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for victims of gross violations of international human-rights law and serious violations of humanitarian law. The document identifies access to justice, relevant information and appropriate remedies; potential forms of reparation include restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction and guarantees of non-repetition. It is a framework of principles, not a judgment that the United States owes a particular sum for every historical event (Source 06).

For each investigated episode, a proposed independent panel would identify the victims or affected communities, the documented acts, the relevant law at the time, causal evidence, surviving harms and available remedies. It would solicit meaningful participation by affected governments, survivors and local researchers, including people who disagree about how the history should be understood.

Potential responses range from a public acknowledgment or archival correction to memorialization, targeted health or environmental remediation, return of identifiable property where legally appropriate, institutional reform, education, or a negotiated financial remedy. These are options to assess, not a prewritten invoice to be mailed to whichever country has a difficult relationship with Washington.

Any negotiated remedy should state the beneficiaries, eligibility, administration, dispute procedures, anti-corruption protections, measurement and review. Local consent matters. So does evidence that the proposed intervention actually addresses the documented harm.

THE LEGAL PATH · WHO HAS THE AUTHORITY?

Congress can establish investigatory commissions, authorize appropriations, require reports, amend declassification and archival procedures where constitutionally permissible, and consider specific remedy legislation. Executive agencies have responsibilities for records, classification and foreign relations. Courts, treaties, sovereign immunity, statutes of limitations and other legal rules affect which claims can be heard or paid.

Federal law already regulates certain covert action through written presidential findings and congressional intelligence oversight. Under 50 U.S.C. § 3093, covered covert action requires statutory findings and reporting, subject to narrowly defined procedures for exceptional circumstances. Existing law is relevant to preventing future abuses but does not itself create a universal historical compensation fund (Source 07).

AP proposes a phased route: first create the historical inventory; then prioritize cases based on documentary availability, seriousness of alleged harm and requests from affected communities; then publish independently reviewed findings; finally consider distinct remedies through lawful domestic authority or negotiated international arrangements.

THE TEN-YEAR LEDGER

The fiscal plan must separate records review and secure archival work, translation, historians and investigators, witness support, hearings, data security, legal staff, public reporting, and any restitution or agreed remedies. A truth commission has administrative costs even if no financial reparations follow; a financial repair program has obligations that require separate legislation and funding.

An honest ten-year estimate cannot yet give a national restitution number because the universe of eligible cases, harm definitions, legal bases, beneficiaries and negotiated remedies are not established. Any country-specific agreement must publish its valuation methods, schedule, administrative cost, safeguards and long-term obligations without treating speculative savings from improved diplomacy as cash already deposited in Treasury.

Budgets should distinguish federal outlays from donations, private settlements, international development funds and benefits flowing to households or institutions. Each dollar credited to repair here cannot be credited again to an unrelated foreign-aid program. Arithmetic does not become less important merely because the policy has a conscience.

WHAT COULD GO WRONG?

A commission can become selective, politicized or historically careless. It can attribute local violence to a single foreign actor, mistake secret intelligence assessments for completed operations, overstate causation, overlook complicating evidence, or promise remedies beyond congressional authority. Opening records can endanger people if redaction is irresponsible. Compensation programs can be captured by elites instead of reaching affected communities.

Critics may reasonably argue that retrospective investigations consume resources better directed toward present needs, that some cases lack reliable records, or that acknowledging one government's actions without examining others produces distorted history. Those arguments deserve direct answers through transparent case selection, independent scholarship, balanced evidence and measurable remedies, not another round of slogans.

The opposite risk is an official history that carefully records the date a memorandum was filed and forgets to ask what happened to the people beneath the policy. We will not substitute moral certainty for research. Nor will we treat uncertainty as permission to close the archive.

MEASURING SUCCESS

Publish the number of country files inventoried and released, declassification processing times, independently substantiated findings, participation by affected communities, case corrections, negotiated remedies actually delivered, administrative expense, safeguards implemented and independent evaluations of whether harms were addressed.

America's ability to admit documented mistakes is not evidence of national weakness. A government secure enough to investigate itself is more credible than one that mistakes permanent secrecy for patriotism.

The republic does not need an innocent autobiography. It needs an accurate one.

SOURCES & FURTHER READING

01 · U.S. Department of State, Office of the Historian — Foreign Relations of the United States, 1952–1954, Guatemala: Preface. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1952-54Guat/preface

02 · U.S. Department of State, Office of the Historian — Foreign Relations of the United States, 1952–1954, Guatemala: Press Release. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1952-54Guat/pressrelease

03 · U.S. National Archives — Release of Papers Relating to Human Rights Abuses in Chile, 1973–1978 (June 30, 1999). https://www.archives.gov/press/press-releases/1999/nr99-93

04 · U.S. Department of State — U.S. Government Declassifies President's Daily Briefs Related to Chile (August 25, 2023). https://2021-2025.state.gov/u-s-government-declassifies-the-presidents-daily-briefs-related-to-chile-from-september-8-1973-and-september-11-1973/

05 · U.S. Department of State, Office of the Historian — About the Foreign Relations of the United States Series. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/about-frus

06 · United Nations General Assembly — Resolution 60/147: Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation (December 16, 2005). https://mandates.un.org/mandate/A/RES/60/147

07 · U.S. House Office of the Law Revision Counsel — 50 U.S.C. § 3093, Presidential Approval and Reporting of Covert Actions. https://uscode.house.gov/us/usc/119-120/t50/s3093/

10 RECOMMENDED ARTICLES, ESSAYS & POLICIES

→ Explore Historical U.S. Intervention, Declassification & Colonial Repair

→ Explore Foreign Policy & International Legal Accountability

→ Explore Latin American & Caribbean Sovereignty & Regional Autonomy

→ Explore Redesign the Faces of American Currency

→ Explore Accountable Data Centers & Grid Planning

→ Explore Barnburners

→ Explore Stalwarts

→ Explore Reformers, Abolitionists & Civil Rights

→ Explore Cultural Labor & Celebrity

→ Explore Women & Gender Labor

WE ARE ONE.  ·  E PLURIBUS UNUM.