THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IS NOT THE PRESIDENT'S PERSONAL LAW FIRM.

VAULT · CAN I SPEAK TO THE MANAGER?

Published by | Langhorne P. Breedlove

MONDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 2026 · 2:10 AM ET

Tags: Department of Justice · Prosecutorial Independence · Civil Rights · Oversight · Accountability · Constitutional Law

Dear fellow American proletariat: The United States maintains a Department of Justice, not a Department of Personal Vindication. This distinction becomes important whenever the people who command prosecutors and investigators also have political enemies, wealthy friends, and a persuasive belief that their own interests coincide perfectly with the public good. The Constitution does not come with a special exemption for a president who feels strongly about the matter.

American Proletariat asks what it would take to reconstruct the Justice Department around impartial law enforcement, constitutional rights, transparent administration and meaningful external checks. The question is institutional, not a proposal to substitute our preferred political prosecutions for someone else's. A law enforcement agency that can be directed to punish enemies today can be directed to punish different enemies tomorrow.

ROOTS · WHY THE DEPARTMENT EXISTS

The Judiciary Act of 1789 established the office of the attorney general. Congress created the Department of Justice on June 22, 1870, with operations beginning July 1, consolidating federal legal work under one executive department. Reconstruction-era enforcement of federal law and civil rights formed part of the environment in which the new institution emerged. (Sources 01, 02)

That history contains an enduring tension. The attorney general is a presidential appointee who directs an executive-branch department, but federal prosecutors are also lawyers bound by law, evidence and professional obligations. The department's own mission statement emphasizes the rule of law, public safety and the protection of civil rights. Independence here is not a claim that DOJ floats constitutionally outside the executive branch; it is a commitment to objective legal decision-making within that structure. (Sources 01, 03)

The Justice Department developed different internal oversight institutions. Its Office of Professional Responsibility was established in 1975 to address misconduct involving DOJ lawyers' professional work. The Office of Inspector General was established in the department in 1989 for independent auditing, investigation and review of operations. These institutions exist already; proposed reconstruction must explain what new powers or safeguards would actually improve them. (Sources 04, 05)

TODAY · WHAT COUNTS AS MISCONDUCT?

DOJ's Justice Manual sets out principles governing decisions to investigate, charge, negotiate pleas and recommend sentencing. It says prosecutors may not allow a person's race, religion, sex, national origin, sexual orientation or political beliefs to influence charging decisions; prosecutors and agents also may not time investigations or charges to affect an election. The guidance is internal executive policy, not a constitutional amendment or an independent criminal statute. (Source 06)

Prosecutorial discretion is unavoidable in a legal system with limited staff, changing evidence and multiple jurisdictions. But discretion also creates opportunities for inconsistency and improper influence. A declination may reflect insufficient proof or an appropriate jurisdictional decision; a prosecution may reflect compelling evidence. Neither outcome alone proves political interference. The evidence must establish the relevant decision, rule, participants and chronology. (Source 06)

Oversight jurisdiction is also more complicated than the public may expect. The inspector general can audit and investigate many DOJ operations, including misconduct by employees, while certain allegations about DOJ attorneys' exercise of investigative, litigation or legal-advice authority are referred to the Office of Professional Responsibility under 5 U.S.C. § 413(b)(3). Referral does not itself establish misconduct. (Source 05)

Special counsel regulations provide another partial safeguard. Under 28 C.F.R. Part 600, a qualifying special counsel is not subject to ordinary day-to-day department supervision, but the attorney general retains specified authority to demand explanations and prevent particular actions under the regulation. Special counsel status is not complete separation from political appointment or judicial review. (Source 07)

WHO DECIDED? POWER & ITS LIMITS

The president appoints the attorney general with Senate advice and consent, and the attorney general supervises the department within statutory and constitutional limits. Congress establishes offices, funds operations, conducts oversight and may amend governing law. Federal courts interpret the law, assess evidence and provide remedies within their jurisdiction. State and Tribal justice systems exercise distinct authority. Reconstruction cannot treat those institutions as interchangeable pieces of a presidential organization chart.

The FBI, Bureau of Prisons, U.S. Marshals Service, Drug Enforcement Administration, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Attorneys and civil litigating divisions perform different missions. Auditing overlapping administrative work may be worthwhile; abolishing a legal function without identifying which lawful institution must perform it next would be government by disappearing act. (Sources 03, 05)

WHAT RECONSTRUCTION WOULD HAVE TO ANSWER

01 · PROSECUTIONS WITHOUT POLITICAL ORDERS

Should contacts between political officials and career prosecutors concerning particular investigations be documented, restricted and reviewed? Which communications are legitimate policy supervision, and which amount to interference in a particular case? A credible reform must preserve lawful executive authority while establishing records sufficient to detect retaliation and favoritism.

02 · OVERSIGHT THAT CAN INSPECT THE OVERSEERS

Should Congress strengthen inspector-general access, reporting, protected complaint channels and independent evaluation of professional-misconduct investigations? Existing roles must be mapped before merging them. Moving a complaint to another office does not make an allegation true, and duplicating investigators may create delay instead of independence.

03 · CIVIL RIGHTS AS AN ENFORCEABLE MISSION

DOJ's civil-rights responsibilities require competent investigators, attorneys, evidence standards and access to courts. Enforcement priorities can change with administrations, but protected classes and statutory rights do not vanish because a political official dislikes their beneficiaries. Reform must guard against both selective inaction and overbroad accusations made without legal proof.

04 · TRANSPARENT DECLINATIONS & DISCIPLINE

Publish aggregate data on referrals, case processing, substantiated misconduct, disciplinary actions, settlements and corrective steps, using privacy and fair-trial safeguards. High-profile investigative material cannot all be made public without harming innocent people, witnesses, confidential sources or active proceedings. Transparency means disciplined disclosure, not broadcasting every unproven accusation.

05 · CONTINUITY BEFORE REORGANIZATION

Any plan to consolidate offices, transfer programs or revise prosecutorial rules needs statutory analysis, budget authority, employee protections, record retention and uninterrupted service for courts and the public. The objective is more reliable justice, not a new set of acronyms mounted above the same broken processes.

WHAT THE EVIDENCE DOES & DOES NOT PROVE

A failed internal investigation, a controversial prosecution or an inspector-general report may expose institutional weaknesses, but the claims must be evaluated separately. Alleged political motives require documentary or testimonial evidence. Audit findings establish the deficiencies they actually document; they are not blanket verdicts against every attorney or investigator. Protecting constitutional rights also includes defendants, complainants and employees whose views differ from those of the movement proposing reform.

A strong independent prosecutor may deter interference but also raise questions about accountability, cost and constitutional executive authority. More congressional oversight may expose misconduct but can become partisan theater. Civil-service protection can defend professional judgment, yet accountability must still exist for negligence or intentional violations. These are genuine design tensions rather than excuses for institutional paralysis.

THE TEN-YEAR LEDGER

The baseline must identify appropriated DOJ offices, inspector-general and professional-responsibility operations, U.S. attorney staffing, litigation and legal support, correctional and law-enforcement components, technology contracts and current compliance programs. Those spending categories differ and should not be collapsed into a single supposedly recoverable budget.

For the first year, model an independent functional audit, conflict-of-interest controls, information systems, investigative staffing, protected reporting channels, case-management improvements, training, legal review and transition expenses. For ten fiscal years, separately estimate ongoing oversight, litigation, remediation, audit costs, savings from verified administrative consolidation, changes in processing time and financial recoveries actually supported by evidence.

A reorganization can cost more in its first years while improving accountability over time. The ledger should compare maintaining existing structures with targeted oversight reform and more extensive congressionally authorized reconstruction. AP cannot credibly assign a first-year net cost or ten-year savings total until powers, staffing, funding and affected components are specified. Criminal fines and hypothetical forfeitures should not be treated as a dependable funding source.

WHY IT MATTERS

The government possesses extraordinary power to investigate, charge, detain and litigate against people. Because those powers can protect the public or be misused, legitimacy depends on procedures that survive changes in elected leadership. A department that obeys neither law nor accountability is dangerous; a department unanswerable to lawful democratic oversight would be dangerous in a different way.

Reconstruction is not a license to pick new targets and call revenge reform. The standard is harder: lawful authority, impartial decisions, real remedies, independent evidence and a public record showing whether the institution honored its obligations. A justice department should be able to investigate a powerful person without fear—and decline an unsupported case without asking which party will be offended.

SOURCES & FURTHER READING

01 · National Archives — Department of Justice Records, creation of DOJ on June 22, 1870 and its predecessor office. https://www.archives.gov/research/investigations/doj

02 · U.S. Department of Justice — History of the Department of Justice, historical timeline. https://www.justice.gov/history

03 · U.S. Department of Justice — Organization, Mission and Functions Manual, institutional mission and components. https://www.justice.gov/doj/organization-mission-and-functions-manual

04 · U.S. Department of Justice — Office of Professional Responsibility, history and functions. https://www.justice.gov/doj/office-professional-responsibility

05 · U.S. Department of Justice Office of Inspector General — Jurisdiction and Relationship to the Office of Professional Responsibility. https://oig.justice.gov/jurisdiction-and-relationship-office-professional-responsibility

06 · U.S. Department of Justice — Justice Manual, § 9-27.000, Principles of Federal Prosecution, updated June 2023. https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-9-27000-principles-federal-prosecution

07 · Electronic Code of Federal Regulations / Cornell Legal Information Institute — 28 C.F.R. § 600.7, Special Counsel Conduct and Accountability. https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/600.7

10 RECOMMENDED ARTICLES, ESSAYS & POLICIES

→ Explore Reconstruct Federal Enforcement Oversight

→ Explore Whole-of-Government Constitutional Audit

→ Explore Corruption, Lobbying, Official Misconduct & Accountability

→ Explore Industrial Hemp & Sustainable Materials

→ Explore Global Ocean Restoration

→ Explore Bourbons

→ Explore Libertarians

→ Explore Contemporary Power Brokers

→ Explore Reformers, Abolitionists & Civil Rights

→ Explore The $28 Federal Minimum Wage

WE ARE ONE.  ·  E PLURIBUS UNUM.